Each time I place on Seddit, or any other public forum, there’s always ONE man on the thread who chimes in with just the same “Match Denialist” arguments (See this thread for the most recent example). Rather than arguing with them one by one, I believed I’d develop just one FAQ that we could direct Game Denialists, Seems Cash & Standing and “It won’t work for me” men. !
It is a work in progress, so please don’t hesitate to add common “match denialist” arguments as well as their retorts in the opinions.
Dear Game Denialist
I’m sorry for the impersonal answer, but I’ve had this discussion before, and I understand where it goes. Actually, there’s an army of men that are almost EXACTLY like you who come comes onto /r/seduction and post the EXACT same things that you’re going to post. So I’m only going to reply all your questions once in this one huge post. !
Lets get started shall we? !
Game Denialist: Game doesn’t function, the sole matters that truly matter are Looks, Cash and Status (LM&S).
I’ll acknowledge that having LM&S makes things a lot simpler, but it’s not accurate that those are the sole things that girls are interested in. I am aware this since I work a lot with men who’ve LM&S and still do very with girls, and I know a lot of men that have almost no LM&S and they do extremely well.
& nbsp;
Game Denialist: Well, I am aware that LM&S is everything, since I know men who’ve LM&S and do amazing, and I ‘ve nothing. This is because I ‘ve something wrong with me that’s entirely outside my control.
& nbsp;
What you’re doing here is participating in black and white thinking) You believe that LM&S is either everything, or nothing, while denying that it might be a factor but one that can be beat.
Have you considered the reality your issues with girls may be at least somewhat under your management?Even in the event you don’t believe that game operates, what about visiting the gym or working in your design or your attitude?
Game Denialist: Those won’t work either. Perhaps some low class or unattractive girls might react to game or fashion or improved fitness, but EXTREMELY hot girls simply blow me away entirely, as they do to all guys who don’t have LM&S.
What you’re doing here is filtering. You agree that one can get SOME results from working out or working on fashion, but then you blow off them for arbitrary reasons. What about your attitude?
Game Denialist: What do you mean? I got a great disposition and there’s no possible way that my approach could be causing me problems in my personal game. I literally always have PERFECT approach, and yet girls still treat me like soil.
Blaming others and refusing to look at your own purpose in your issues are typical defence mechanisms. !
What’s the first business of one who practices philosophy? To eliminate self-conceit. For it’s impossible for anybody to start to learn that which he believes he already understands. & #8211; Epictetus
Are you currently positive your approach couldn’t be the cause of only SOME of your troubles?
Game Denialist: I’ll confess I get frustrated a bit, but it’s only because hot girls treat me horribly. I actually have a superb positive outlook and I’m consistently pleasant to everyone, I’m a perfect gentleman. !
Retort: Really? Because I’ve just spoke to you personally over the net for about 300 words and I presume you’ve a poor outlook. Additionally, for some reason you enjoy hanging around on seduction newsgroups and telling folks that picking up doesn’t work. Do you believe that’s something that a favorable man does?
Game Denialist: I’m only saying the truth. Game doesn’t work, unless you’re genetically gifted working out doesn’t work. Girls need Looks, Cash and Standing and building “self-assurance” or enhancing your “mind-set” doesn’t do a darn thing. I hang around on these forums to let folks know not to squander their time.
Retort: Well, I believe that Nickleback is a shitty group, but I don’t go onto Nickleback newsgroups and argue with people when they talk about their favourite Nickleback tune? I’m not greatly invested in my dislike. You, on the flip side, appear to actually be emotionally invested in the thought that you just can’t enhance yourself. Do you see that? I would like to guess, you also spend lots of time on Game Denialist newsgroups that reenforce your worldview?
Game Denialist: Yes, I spend lots of time on Game Denialist newsgroups where we whine about the way in which the world isn’t reasonable and how development is essentially hopeless. But I don’t see what’s wrong with that. The folks on those forums are the sole individuals who really see the world for what it really is. !
Retort: What you’re doing here is seeking out evidence for your prejudices, from individuals who share exactly the same prejudices as you. You might not believe the men on some Game Denialist site are truly the elite few who’ve “found it out”?
Anyhow, at about this stage I get upset as well as the vein on my forehead begins to bulge out and I quit reacting, but if anyone else has some common game denialist arguments as well as their counterarguments, I’d love to hear them.
The post Complete FAQ for Game Denialists, Just Seems Issue and “It Wont Work For Me” Men. seemed first on Tenmagnet.com.
