XtremeMind.com

[Arman]

http://hubpages.com/hub/Scientists_cure_cancer__but_no_one_takes_notice

Rayzorblades, you might be interested in this (unless you've already come across it).

Reckon this principle could be combined with radionic trend-setting to cure the lil' fookers?

Arman

[Rayzorblades]

Thankyou for linking. The biology in the hub has some mistakes (mitochondria don't "fight cancer" directly, and are just a tiny part of apoptosis for example), but its depiction of how DCA works is accurate.

Anyway, I first read about DCA last January in a bio textbook of all places and my initial thought what "WHAT THE PHUCK?!", albeit I shouldn't have been surprised, big pharma being what it is. Even the textbook's authors had the tone of finding it ridiculous.

DCA does have some potential side effects (the wiki page for it lists them), but that aside if you've got nothing else to try or are still early stage then I'd give it a whirl.

On a related note, years ago (2001-ish) a colleague of mine from a Californian university that shall go namelesss, discovered a compound in concord grapes that completely (and rapidly) reversed cancer growth both in petri dishes and in mouse and rat models. When he showed his data to his university's board of regents they told him in no uncertain terms that they would destroy him. He'd be fired and blackballed from every institution of business where he could get a job as anything more than a janitor and he'd never be a biologist again. They also said his work would be destroyed and if anything was somehow published they would go out of their way to "peer review" his findings as complete bunk science.

Take that anecdote from a guy on a forum with whatever salt it's worth, but this report reminded me of my buddy's story, and now that I think about it, maybe it was DCA's efficacy against cancer he discovered. Acetic acid is one of the main ingredients in vinegar afterall.
_________________

[Alastan]

I had seen this article as well.

First thing I did was show my friend with cancer, poor girl. Showed her a few ways actually.

Its a real sad sight, that big pharma can operate the way it does.

Here's hoping they get a reckoning soon enough.

[Renderer]

So this tells me (again) of the benefits of low-carb diets! Well, as long as you keep your protein intake at a proper level and have enough fat intake you're fine, right? I read that the only parts of the body that can't feed off fats or ketone bodies are some cells in the eyes(retinas), and red and white blood cells, which is not unimportant, but these can survive on glucose generated out of proteins in a process called gluconeogenesis, which is the reason to keep proteins at a fair level in a low-carb diet, since this process leaves some elements like nitrogen alone which stay in the kidneys and can cause problems.

Funny how people tell you, you're gonna get a cancer if you eat too much red meat, and then this.

By the way, the pharmaceutical industry is embarrassing. I also read that AIDS isn't caused by HIV. That they could never take a picture of an isolated HIV, that this is a requirement for virologists to consider every virus as such. That the only way to test whether you have HIV is INDIRECTLY(because for some reason its presence can't be detected) by measuring your antibodies level, and if it's too high then you're told you have it, but it could be high for the stress alone too. That some scientist don't believe in its existence. If that was true, this pharmaceutical industry is really a monster. Think about the money they make with drugs for AIDS treatment (which I read, is part of the things that cause AIDS in turn, along with drug habits and stress). BTW AIDS isn't a sickness, it's a set of different symptoms. I'm not making any claims, because I can't. I'm just telling, and if you personally know someone being treated for AIDS, I'm sorry and will delete this if you ask me to.

[Rayzorblades]

AIDS is an interesting phenomenon.

I remember hearing recently about a Noble Prize for the scientists who actually discovered the way to see the virus itself, disinformation that might be, who knows?

What gets me is that sheer number of both false positives and false negatives in HIV testing. I read that it's around 30% or so. Meaning one of every 3 people who DON'T have it test positive and have their lives ruined forever, and 1 out of every 3 who DO have it test negative and could potentially (assuming it exists) be out and about infecting the shit out of people.

I remember years back, my uncle got really badly into smoking crack and horrible lifestyle (no sleep, nothing approaching a proper diet etc) and when tested his CD4 count was below 200 uL. I asked the doc at the time "He has AIDS?", CD 4 being the main way to diagnose at the time, Doc said "Oh no he's just really malnurished" and after being in the hospital for a month he was back under control and kicked his habit. His CD 4 count went back up above the AIDS threshold.

So my question is, how many people have gotten the HIV positive stigma, when the cause of their AIDS symptoms was nothing more than some lifestyle factor? Definitely bunk science if ever there was any, based on these criteria.

And low-carbing, it shows up so much in my life now. Anecdote about self experimenting: if I eat more than about 100g of carbs in a day, I get all my old chronic illnesses back (gastritis, IBS, GRD, lactose intolerance, arthritis in my hands and neck), keeping my carbs in check, and poof, all my symptoms disappear in about 2-3 days. Amazing coincidence...
_________________

[Ice Masta P]

Here are some more potential solutions.

1. Sodium Bicarbonate: mix with water and drink some. It shrinks tumors to nothing.

2. Vitamin C Therapy: Look it up.

3. THC oil: There is a documentary about it: 'Run From the Cure'. I believe it is on Youtube.

4. Hydrogen peroxide therapy: look up a daily dosage schedule. A good thing to do is to take lots of antioxidants along side the oxidizing effect of hydrogren peroxide to prevent free radical damage.

All I can think of at the moment.

[astro11]

Hey rayzborblades, you mentioned you had IBS. How did you cure yourself of it, other than a low-carbs diet? 100 grams of carbs a day sounds ridiculously low, and not really feasible in the long term. Unless, of course, you get the bulk of your calories through protein, but even then I don't see it.

[Renderer]

[astro11]

Interesting. Thanks, Renderer.

It seems confusing since there are different types of diets which seem to work but contradict each other. For instance, the alkaline diet revolves around eating more carbs, but complex carbs. This diet is high protein/high fat/low carbs, and I'm sure it works, but I also keep hearing about how too much meat is bad, so that confuses me as well.

Ice Masta P: Thanks for the tips. As for ingesting baking soda, I wonder if RB and anyone else can chime in on whether this is beneficial or not. Since baking soda alkalizes, but I've also heard that taking it causes the stomach to compensate by increasing acidity? I'm not too sure about this, so if anyone with knowledge about it can clarify, that would be great.

[dboc01]

Anyone seriously interested in this subject of curing cancer, go to http://www.newmedicine.ca
It will absolutely change how you look at any supposedly incurable disease.

[Racca]

@dboc01

I didnt find anything substancial in the site. Is it supposed to buy the books and attend a seminar?

[HSteinfeld]

With regards to cancer, there's only one protocol I trust. And it isn't the sham Clark method (the zappers go only to skin layer due to the very high frequency. Any electronic engineer will tell you that). What I trust is the beck protocol.

Got first hand experience with it too. My aunt's tumor shrunk to nothing on the Beck protocol which consisted of
Blood Pulsing
Magnetic Pulsing
Ozonated water
Colloidal silver

Total cost? $700

If she went chemotherapy, shed have spent thousands of dollars and would still be at deaths door.
_________________
Ich liebe Frauen! Mädchen sind mein Leben